Are you as tired as I am of all the whinging over high-alcohol wines?
Yes some, perhaps many (but not most) wines over — what? — like, 14%-14.5% alcohol by volume? — might strike some tasters as “out of balance.” Certainly any “high alcohol” wine is a risk to drink too much of when one has driven to dinner. But then so are wines with less alcohol, or beers, or cocktails. Yesterday Jon Bonné added to the drone of high-alcohol criticism in his posting to the “Thirst” column at SFGate… with the statement:
The high-alcohol drumbeat isn’t new, but it is prompting more of a backlash. Increasingly, a new guard of winemakers is dismissing old saws about “physiological ripeness.” They’re deliberately, even defiantly, picking grapes with less sugar. Ripeness isn’t California’s challenge anymore; now it’s balance. That means farming smarter. (And not simply removing excess alcohol after the fact.)
I have not met Jon Bonné but I have read him for years — IMHO his writing is often smart and to the point. This bit is not. I’m not sure what “new guard of winemakers” he has been talking to, and I’m not sure what “old saws” he is referring to, but picking grapes solely on the basis of “less sugar” — whether deliberately, defiantly, ignorantly or otherwise — without considering physiological ripeness is definitely not likely to result in a better wine.
I wish (as perhaps does Mr. Bonné) that the definition of “physiological ripeness” for wine grapes was simple and concrete. It is neither. In fact physiological ripeness is an ideal, an unrealizable goal: the perfect overlap of the development of many enologically important components of the grape skin, seeds and pulp. When considering whether an individual grape is “ripe” one could consider the sugars, acids, pH and potassium in the pulp or juice, the anthocyanins and tannins in the skin, the tannins in the seeds, and the aromatic compounds present throughout.
During ripening each of these things is changing with time: some are going up, some are going down, some are going up and then down. “Physiological ripeness” is that moment when all of these things are in “perfect balance” — exactly where they must be to yield a wine of complicated and soul-satisfying deliciousness. Except that it never happens.
In most vineyards, most vintages, some part of the equation peaks too early, or too late. In many California vineyards sugar arrives too early, before the other things that make a perfect wine grape reach their optimal concentrations. It takes some seriously smart farming to make sure this doesn’t happen.
Notice so far I’m still dealing with an idealization — a single wine grape. In the real world each grape on a cluster, each cluster on a vine, each vine in the vineyard is pursuing its own course to “physiological ripeness.” Sure they are all going in the same direction at the same time but like a herd of lemmings running to the sea, some get there before the rest. As a winegrower it is my job to slow that herd up, to bunch them together as much as possible, then snatch them off before most of them have a chance to go over the cliff.
Someday I might write a book on what goes in to assessing grape ripeness and what steps I might take to bunch the crop up. I would include all the other factors that go into the decision of when to pick: things like lignification of the rachis, leaf senescence, disease status, insect pressure, weather forecast, and even the mundane logistical things like the availability of labor, trucking, and tank space. But not tonight.
The bottom line is that no winemaker wakes up one morning during harvest and says “uh, duh-oy — I’m going to pick at lower sugar because high-alcohol wines are really icky.”
If tastemakers want to make high-alcohol wines go away they should stop giving them medals and high point scores. Consumers could make them go away if they would just stop buying them. I’m not holding my breath. In the meantime, bashing “the trend toward ever higher alcohols” will continue to be a reliable trope for trade writers to sell a few more column-inches — and to rile up people like me.


Pingback
by Tweets that mention Grape Ripeness And Wine Alcohol « notes from the winemaker -- Topsy.com
06 Jul 2010 at 14:43
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Club du Vin. Club du Vin said: Grape Ripeness And Wine Alcohol « notes from the winemaker: Certainly any “high alcohol” wine is a risk to dr… http://bit.ly/b92S22 #wine [...]
by Samantha Dugan
09 Jul 2010 at 08:39
A very “balanced” piece John. You and I have talked about this before and I am one of those people that is bothered by high alcohol; burns my nose and chest and keeps me from enjoying another glass but the one thing I noticed about your wines is none of them had that blast of heat that I cannot take. Twas a very valuable lesson for me and showed me that it is possible to have wines with high alcohol levels that are completely balanced.
by John M. Kelly
09 Jul 2010 at 09:37
Samantha you and I both find “heat” in a wine to be a flaw. Someday I’d like to set up a tasting with 100+ wines, spanning price points, regions, varietals and styles – and a range of alcohol levels. I’d like to get a panel of at least 10 experienced tasters to whip through them and rank them for heat and perceived alcohol level. I would bet money that perceived heat would not correlate well with actual alcohol level, and that the tasters would do a poor job of guessing alcohol levels as well. Did you see this bit on W. Blake Gray’s blog where he and Adam Lee failed at guessing alcohols?
I’m just bored with the media droning endlessly about a supposed trend to higher and higher alcohols, like it was some conspiracy hatched by a secret society of winemakers. (Not that there is such a society. Really. There isn’t. I mean it.) A vanishingly small fraction of wine is produced in the world where some consulting winemaker insists on picking raisins, de-alcing the result down to 16% and then aging in three changes of 100% new wood, plus every other trick to plump the result till it is about as real and lovely as Heidi Montag. Then this approximation to a wine gets medals and 100 points, and the media hand-wringing starts.
How much wine is made this way? Very, very… very… little. Heck, artisanal wine accounts for just a tiny fraction of the wine produced in the world, and the vast majority of those wines are made from grapes picked when they are ready — a decision that is not based on some arbitrary sugar level, high or low. Realistically, 99% of the wine in the world is made from grapes that are picked when the winery can fit them in to the production schedule, and those grapes are more likely to come off the vine less ripe rather than more.
by Peter O'Connor
11 Jul 2010 at 10:08
John,
Thoughtful post. I agree with both points: 1) “seriously smart farming” is essential to achieve balance anywhere (not just in California), and crucial to make great wine; 2) the market/consumer is responsible for the high alcohol trend.
There is one aspect, though, about California’s climate (that was also raised by Randall Grahm in his Blog) that hampers the synchronized development of the grape’s enological components during the ripening process: the excessive dryness of its growing season, which leads to the necessity of irrigation.
Dry farming would encourage the development of deep root systems, which in turn would smoothen and increase the reliability of the ripening process; making it easier to achieve adequate sugar levels and mature tannins, while retaining natural acids; if not simultaneously, at least within a feasible time interval.
Site selection should play a major part in this process; with cool climates and heavier (more water-retentive) soils being the natural choice.
by John M. Kelly
11 Jul 2010 at 11:34
Thanks Peter. In my case “seriously smart farming” encompasses late-season irrigation to targeted water stress levels, as well as balancing active leaf area to the crop load. There are others much seriously smarter, doing a better job than we are with more manpower and technical tools, but we are making the effort.
We have to be careful about recommending “heavier soils” — this should be defined carefully and precisely. Soils with enough clay in them are certainly water-retentive, unfortunately to the point that they may not give the water up to the vine root system. If a soil is heavy enough it will permanently inhibit the development of an extensive and deep root system. To my thinking, the best vineyard ground is a well-drained soil with a balance of loam, sand and clay, with a reasonable amount of cobble, underlain by a well-fractured subsoil with water available through the season no shallower than 10′ and no deeper than 20′. But I would defer to a specialist like Paul Skinner for a more thorough definition or analysis.
Pingback
by Grape ripeness and wine alcohol | New World Wine Maker Blog
05 Aug 2010 at 16:08
[...] post originally appeared on John Kelly’s blog: “notes from the winemaker.” John Kelly is the owner and winemaker of Westwood wines, Sonoma, California. Tweet [...]
Pingback
by Wine Alcohol — Here We Go Again « notes from the winemaker
30 Nov 2010 at 22:23
[...] winemakers who actually believe that one can simply harvest at lower sugar and make good wine, as I have said before — this is just not [...]